Movie
Reviews:
Message forum
and movie reviews: Van Helsing This movie page has been viewed 195 times.
Being an avid Hugh Jackman fan and devotee of Drac
moviejunkie
Mar 16, 06
Being an avid Hugh Jackman fan and devotee of Dracula legend, I was so looking forward to this supernatural saga of the fables 19th-century vampire hunter. But it's a disappointment.
Gabriel Van Helsing (Hugh Jackman) is a man-on-a-mission, determined to rid the world of its most evil, nightmarish creatures. Working through a clandestine Catholic connection, he's off to slay Count Dracula (Richard Roxburgh), along with Dracula's jealous, bloodthirsty brides. But in Transylvania, he's not the only vampire hunter. There's intrepid, corset-clad Anna Valerious (sexy Kate Beckinsale), plus Frankenstein's Monster, the Wolf Man, even Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde.
Best known for his "Mummy" films, writer/director Stephen Sommers primarily concentrates on the stylishly visual action sequences and - to his credit - the photography, atmospheric Prague locales and stunts (primarily wire-work) are eye-candy, particularly when Dracula walks up a pillar and across the ceiling, while his brides are hanging upside down. For comic relief, there's Friar Carl (David Wenman), Igor (Kevin J. O'Connor) and Dracula's tiny CGI gremlins. But the characters and cliché Gothic creatures, culled from Universal Studios' archives, lack substance, complexity, even originality, although, eventually, one discovers that enigmatic Van Helsing has something in common with the monsters he's killing, personal issues. Saying more than that would reveal too much. On the Granger Movie Gauge of 1 to 10, "Van Helsing" is a fast-paced, flashy, fiendish 5. To capitalize on this campy creature-feature, on May 11th, there's a new, animated, half-hour, direct-to-video prequel, "Van Helsing: The London Assignment." But - bottom line - Hugh Jackman deserves better, even if this becomes another franchise.
This movie suffers from over-kill. The story is to
moviejunkie
Mar 16, 06
This movie suffers from over-kill. The story is too fast paced to really develop into anything meaningful. The first 10 minutes of the movie are excellent, cinematography and faux b/w give the opening a 10. But the movie quickly spirals downward.
The acting by Dracula is horrendous, and sets the movie back. Yes, there is some kick-ass action, and the unique perspective on all the famous literary monsters is intersting. I can hardly bare to give this one a 7.
